• Forgotten Traditions of Resistance: Islamic History and the Challenge of Modern Passivity

    Islamic history has long been recognized as a rich source of ethical, theological, and philosophical insights that have shaped generations of thought and practice. While scholarship often emphasizes dimensions such as jurisprudence, spirituality, and intellectual tradition, one crucial aspect tends to receive comparatively less attention in contemporary discourse: the concept of political resistance.

    In the present context, it may be argued that segments of the Muslim community exhibit a diminished responsiveness to systemic oppression. The influence of global capitalism, with its emphasis on individual productivity and material pursuits, arguably contributes to a depoliticization of collective consciousness. As a result, historical precedents of resistance are often underexamined or insufficiently integrated into modern ethical frameworks.

    Historical examples, however, demonstrate that resistance has been a recurring and significant element within Islamic societies. One illustrative case is the resistance of the Moriscos in early modern Spain. Following the fall of Muslim rule in the Iberian Peninsula, these forcibly converted Muslims were subjected to systematic repression under the Spanish Crown. Policies included compulsory conversion to Christianity, prohibition of the Arabic language, and the suppression of Islamic cultural practices. In response, segments of the Morisco population organized a rebellion under the leadership of Fernando de Válor, also known as Aben Humeya. Although ultimately unsuccessful, this uprising represents a significant instance of resistance against religious and cultural coercion.

    Similar examples also occurred in the contemporary period. Following the breakup of Yugoslavia in the 90’s, a group of Bosnian Jihadist was formed to contain genocide from the Serbs and Croats. Although resulted in a huge population loss, the resistance enticed international Muslim solidarity and became a symbol of Islamic resistance in the modern times.

    At a more foundational level, the mission of Prophet Muhammad can also be interpreted through the lens of political resistance. His early struggle in Mecca was not solely a theological endeavor but also a challenge to the entrenched socio-political order of the Quraysh elite, whose authority was closely tied to economic control and tribal hierarchy. The emergence of Islam thus entailed both spiritual transformation and a reconfiguration of power relations, positioning it as a form of resistance to systemic injustice.

    Fast-forward to today’s context, oppression has transformed into a more subtle, non-coercive and unrecognizable form. This transformation diminish collective consciousness among the people. Thus, political resistance discourse needs to reach the unconscious minds. Besides religious teachings, lectures about Islamic political resistance are also necessary to be echoed in Muslim communal gatherings and media.

    In conclusion, the historical record suggests that political resistance constitutes an integral dimension of Islamic tradition. Re-engaging with this aspect may offer a more comprehensive understanding of Islamic ethics, particularly in addressing contemporary forms of oppression and inequality.

  • Would the world be better if there were no beauty privilege?

    Is it true because of the beauty or the desire to be seen?


    I often hear that beauty can solve at least 50% of your problems. Once you have beauty that fits social standards, it means you are easier to listen to, easier to notice, and easier to get new opportunities. Even to fulfill basic human needs, we still need to cover our faces with makeup just to be seen and heard.

    When I was young, I never thought that being labeled “ugly” or “unpretty” would be a big deal. I thought I would still have my books and my drawings. I thought people out there would be kind and pure at heart. People would eventually be heard, because that’s the function and reason why we have ears and hearts.

    And then there’s a question: would life be better when there’s no beauty privilege? Would I shut my mouth if I had at least one criterion from society’s beauty standards? Bright to white skin, a pointed nose, straight teeth, clear skin. I have none. Would the “uglies” have their own opportunity to at least survive in this world?

    I keep repeating the question: would the world be better when there’s no beauty privilege? I guess yes. But there would be another comparison. It might not be beauty, maybe something else that can be seen. Maybe it’s about how big your eyes are, or maybe about how smart you are. The numbers would be crazy. Everything would be counted in numbers, because there’s nothing to compare before we test it out, since they are unseen.

    Maybe it’s not about “beauty privilege,” but actually about arrogance. Human nature. The need to be seen and to feel better than others. The bias. I think even when beauty privilege does not exist, humans will eventually create another hierarchy.